Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9ias release 2 not recommended

Re: 9ias release 2 not recommended

From: Daniel Morgan <dmorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 19:52:42 GMT
Message-ID: <3D25F8E1.61625A95@exesolutions.com>


sg wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have recently made 6 9ias release 2 installation in last couple of
> weeks and the result is disappointing. The support on this product is
> poor not saying none and the product is buggy and any modification to a
> single component forces you to modify almost everything! That means
> DOWNTIME. I feel that Oracle wants to integrate it so much that make it
> a mess, since all components are related then move a string everything
> falls! Also everything is embedded in java classes make almost
> impossible to diagnostic where has gone wrong.
>
> Suggestion: dont use iAS if you can, avoid it in production because
> there virtually no support. Just an example a opened Tar for 2 weeks and
> 3 days got useless response and finally what we get is you hit the bug,
> reinstall is your only choice! Oh the bug is you cannot modify
> hostname/ip (what the heck!) after installation because they get
> hard-coded during installation.... (and there are 3 or 4 more bugs we hit)
>
> I dont understand why after so much delay Oracle still comes out with
> such buggy product

There is a price to be paid trying to put any release of any software into production immediately. New releases are generally put on development and testing boxes and not moved to production until proven stable. I might note for you that Oracle Corp., itself, has yet to put Oracle 9i into production with its own 11i applications.

So if you are running ahead of Oracle then one might ask why?

And if you are finding bugs such as you discuss in production ... once again one might ask why? Don't you try software out in development and test environments first?

Daniel Morgan Received on Fri Jul 05 2002 - 14:52:42 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US