Re: 30 instances on one host (Windoz?)

Well, I maybe slow but at least -I saw- that it was a joke eventually.

No one's forcing anyone to do anything.

I doubt a request for comp.oracle.moderated would be turned down. Athough it may be difficult to find a suitable moderator, since a SOH is a definate requirement.

"Keld Nielsen" <keldnielsen_at_image.dk> wrote in message news:dUIT8.99759$N46.2533992_at_news010.worldonline.dk...
> Tend to agree with Sybrand when he wrote:
>
> "Sometimes it is regrettable this isn't a
> moderated newsgroup, and
> every idiot is allowed to post absolute nonsense
> and crap here."
>
> and I don't really feel I got out on the wrong
> side of the bed.
>
> I like to learn from what is posted in this NG and
> sometimes
> I may be able to contribute with whatever 2c I
> have, but to
> be forced to download crap (yours included !) is a
> hassle.
>
> "I've read this a number of times ..." gee
>
> "David Lord" <davelord_at_hotmail.com> wrote in
> message news:afna6s$2ue$1_at_nntp-m01.news.aol.com...
> > I've read this a number of times and I just
> can't make it out. Even
> > replacing 'instance' for another word doesn't
> help.
> >
> > As for 30 instances on a single machine, no
> problem so long as the machine
> > is good enough. I've worked places with 30+
> instances on a single node for
> > development purposes although most rarely had
> more than a few users. I've
> > only seen this under UNIX(Solaris on E10K and
> HP-UX on V-Class, but not on
> > Windows anything). It'd be interesting to hear
> about an actual installation
> > of more than 10 instances under Windows;
> certainly there are hardware
> > configurations to support this (Compaq Prolient
> for example).
> >
> > I've read it again. Ha Ha Ha, very funnny. I
> guess this is not a
> > telecomm... :)
> >
> > "basrad_at_oraspec.ind" <daekw_at_yahoo.com> wrote in
> message
> > news:afmfp1$peo$07$2_at_news.t-online.com...
> > > we are very good dba experts here, we put
> always 50 instances
> > > on a machine
> > > so we put every table in a seperate instance
> this is very good for control
> > > for every instance we have 5 of our expert dba
> > > so it is always a little crowdy in front of
> our servers
> > >
> > > but my boss said why not puting every record
> in a seperate instance,
> > > but we would need o lot more dba for doing
> this
> > >
> > > and backup is also very simple
> > >
> > > every dba can memorize his record and key it
> in after data loss
> > >
> > > this happens very often with this buggy
> oracle, but with our expert
> > > dba this is no problem at all
> > >
> > >
> > > "R Chin" <rchin_at_panix.com> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag
> > > news:afljis$qdn$2_at_reader2.panix.com...
> > > > Geez...Im wondering if this thread is
> breaking the record of being the
> > > > longest
> > > > in this group.....certainly the longest I
> have seen....in any group
> > > ever....
> > > > well let me see if I can help make it
> longer...
> > > >
> > > > What about running 30 instances on Windoz ?
> Is it even possible ?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Mon Jul 01 2002 - 02:57:14 CDT