Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Rollback extents

Re: Rollback extents

From: Steve Ashmore <sashmore_at_neonramp.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:58:37 -0500
Message-ID: <uhmv3r9c783o00@corp.supernews.com>


That is what I get for working on this at 5AM.

Nologging is of course for used to suspend redo generation.

Interesting though. If you do a direct load insert you can still issue a rollback and at least some rollback information is generated. I was playing with this today.

Niall , thanx for keeping me honest.

Steve

"Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message

news:3d19c892$0$225$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net...

> "Steve Ashmore" <sashmore_at_neonramp.com> wrote in message
> news:uhj77gl5qg0098_at_corp.supernews.com...
> > As Mr Kyte recently point out, the table must be in
> > Nologging mode in order not to generate
> > REDO or rollback when using the APPEND Hint.
>
> Nologging applies to redo not to rollback/undo. My understanding (and
> admittedly you've now made me question it) is that *undo* is skipped on
> direct load. In anycase there is nothing to stop you altering the table
> nologging before a batch load of this type assuming you'll take a backup
> afterward.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
> *****************************************
> Please include version and platform
> and SQL where applicable
> It makes life easier and increases the
> likelihood of a good answer
>
> ******************************************
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 27 2002 - 15:58:37 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US