(That was 9i release 1, of course, but the point's the same: 'uncertified'
doesn't mean 'it won't work', just 'we don't know for sure that it does')
Regards
HJR
"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message
news:af9ao5$phd$2_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...
> Don't panic. I didn't read your original post, but if all you are doing is
> personal testing, then 9i works fine on XP Home. It isn't certified as
> Sybrand says, which means if you get unexpected results or strange
behaviour
> you're on your own. But I had it running fine for several months last
year.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
> "Imprecise" <f_puhan_at_precise.com> wrote in message
> news:f_puhan-9A3B50.17253524062002_at_vienna7.his.com...
> > In article <uhf0kg1nkfld1d_at_corp.supernews.com>,
> > "Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > 9i is certified for Professional only.
> >
> > Damn. Thanks, Sybrand.
> >
> > --
> > The underscore character does not belong in my address. You know the
> drill...
> > ***
> > Anyone sufficiently smart enough to configure and use USEnet for
research
> should
> > be smart enough to Read The Freakin' Documentation!
>
>
Received on Tue Jun 25 2002 - 04:05:20 CDT
