Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Basic question on RAID array / Tablespace configuration.

Re: Basic question on RAID array / Tablespace configuration.

From: Ryan <rgaffuri_at_cox.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 23:50:05 GMT
Message-ID: <N28R8.68325$hF5.2890600@news2.east.cox.net>


Really howard?

I could have sworn that I read the the Oracle Performance tuning book by Richard Niemac and others that you should seperate your table extents from your index extents on separate drives to avoid I/O problems?

Did I read this wrong or is this just another bad book?

"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message news:af21tj$700$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...
>
> "TR" <tman_at_tman.dnsalias.com> wrote in message
> news:6t%Q8.26123$XF6.3372526731_at_newssvr10.news.prodigy.com...
> > Have an approx 50 GB database (that is data+indexes) that will be used
for
> > aggregation queries and other OLAP type of stuff. E.g. write
performance
> > next to irrelevant, massive sequential reads from index and tables, I
> guess
> > not a whole lot of probe-type random reads. Beware some of the queries
do
> > heavy writes to TEMP space.
> >
> > Hardware available is 8 80GB drives. Loss of data in the event of a
drive
> > loss is of very little concern.
> >
> > Thoughts?:
> >
> > -> Stripe (RAID0) all 8 drives, then logically partition into Data,
Index,
> > Temp, etc.
> > -> Stripe (RAID0) 3 drives for Data, 3drives for Index, 2 for Temp.
E.g.
> > ensure that index and data are on separate physical devices.
>
>
> You've not been reading recent threads here, have you?
>
> There is precisely zero benefit in separating tables from their indexes
for
> performance reasons. Both are segments. Just like Table A and Table B are
> both segments. Separate A from B by all means, but unless you're
consistent,
> there's no point in separating a table from its index.
>
> Except for ease of management. Which I don't think you're even going to
> obtain in a RAID environment.
>
> TEMP, yes. Maybe. Rollback, yes, maybe. But not tables and indexes.
>
> > -> Any better configurations?
> >
>
> I'd be going for 3 for data+indexes. 3 for rollback. 2 for temp. Just my
> thoughts.
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > TR.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Sat Jun 22 2002 - 18:50:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US