Perhaps instead of SOAP he needs DIRT (Digital Internet Reliable Transfers)...
Mike
oratune_at_msn.com (David Fitzjarrell) wrote in message news:<32d39fb1.0206191110.30bade2a_at_posting.google.com>...
> You just say that because it's true ...
>
> "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote in message news:<3d109aca$0$8514$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>...
> > "Jeremy Ovenden" <newsposter_at_hazelweb.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:aen16s$7qp8k$1_at_ID-140241.news.dfncis.de...
> > > If presented with the requirement to enable two browser-based
> > > systems [1] to communicate with each other in real-time over the
> > > internet, what technologies would you implement and why?
> > >
> > > If we were to state reliability and simplicity as essential
> > > requirements, would this affect your choice?
> > >
> > > [1] the real-world example I am looking at involves one system
> > > running on SQL Server and one running on Oracle 8i
> >
> > If you really mean "in real time" then I'd be tempted to say it can't be
> > done reliably at all.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > Audit Commission UK
> > *****************************************
> > Please include version and platform
> > and SQL where applicable
> > It makes life easier and increases the
> > likelihood of a good answer
> >
> > ******************************************
Received on Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:46:23 CDT
