Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: And another one about PL/SQL

Re: And another one about PL/SQL

From: Connor McDonald <connor_mcdonald_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:39:24 +0100
Message-ID: <3D124B8C.12F9@yahoo.com>


Norman Dunbar wrote:
>
> Ralph,
>
> in what way are triggers known to be unstable ?
>
> Just curious as I've never come across anything like that before, and I
> use triggers quite a lot nowadays.
>
> Regards,
> Norman.
>
> -------------------------------------
> Norman Dunbar
> Database/Unix administrator
> Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
> mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk
> Tel: 0113 289 6265
> Fax: 0113 289 3146
> URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
> -------------------------------------
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rsarwar_at_ifsna.com (Rauf Sarwar) [mailto:rsarwar_at_ifsna.com]
> Posted At: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 11:06 PM
> Posted To: server
> Conversation: And another one about PL/SQL
> Subject: Re: And another one about PL/SQL
>
> >> Since triggers are known to be very unstable, I would highly
> recommend
> >> using PACKAGES.

I'm guessing here...but triggers have been known to get a bad name because people use them to attempt to enforce referential integrity...which is a very very bad idea.

hth
connor

-- 
==============================
Connor McDonald

http://www.oracledba.co.uk

"Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue..."
Received on Thu Jun 20 2002 - 16:39:24 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US