Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: What do you do with an ENORMOUS primary key?

Re: What do you do with an ENORMOUS primary key?

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 11:12:02 +0100
Message-ID: <3d11aa73$0$232$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


You could consider a meaningless key generated by a sequence.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message
news:aerjeu$guk$1_at_lust.ihug.co.nz...

> Suppose I have a table as follows:
>
> Create table STANDARDS (
> asstcode varchar2(3),
> jobcode number(5,0),
> season varchar2(3),
> period number (2,0),
> week number (2,0),
> day varchar2(3))
>
> In other words, an asset can have all sorts of jobs performed to it, and
> those jobs can be scheduled to occur 'sometime in Spring', or 'sometime in
> March', or sometime in week 16, or on Thursday.
>
> The scheduling options are mostly mutually exclusive: if you say 'sometime
> in Spring', you can't then say you want it done in Week 16. Either you are
> vague, or you are specific.
>
> The exception is the week/day combination. You might want a job performed
> each Tuesday and Thursday of week 16, so using both the week and the day
> columns is permitted.
>
> My trouble is that since an assett can have many jobs scheduled for it,
and
> each job can be scheduled many times, the entire table is the entire
primary
> key.... and that doesn't feel right to me. I've actually created this
table
> as 'ORGANIZATION INDEX', so if it *is* right, I can cope as best as
> possible.
>
> But are there any other suggestions? (And feel free to criticise the
> design/understanding of the relational model and so forth. I first created
> this table about 12 years ago. I've not seen an easier or more appropriate
> way of doing it before now, but one can always learn).
>
> Regards
> HJR
>
>
Received on Thu Jun 20 2002 - 05:12:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US