Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Why PUBLIC SYNONYM is bad ?

Re: Why PUBLIC SYNONYM is bad ?

From: Thomas Kyte <tkyte_at_oracle.com>
Date: 17 Jun 2002 08:14:25 -0700
Message-ID: <aekuch0lca@drn.newsguy.com>


In article <3D0D25A3.FD16FCC7_at_noos.fr>, cava123 says...
>
>Thank You Yong, but is there any security impact with public or private synonyms
>?.
>

none, period -- zero, zippo.

if you cannot access the underlying object, a synonym won't help you.

>Yong Huang a écrit :
>
>>Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
>>news:<3d0bfd7e$0$28008$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...
>> >
>> > For some good text stuff on public synonyms and their performance impact,
>> > see Steve Adam's site: www.ixora.com.au
>> > There is a section on newsletters and IIRC the synonym stuff is in one of
>> > them.
>>
>> It's here:
>> http://www.ixora.com.au/newsletter/2001_05.htm#synonyms
>>
>> Steve shows that synonyms, particularly public synonyms, are indeed
>> bad in terms of CPU usage. But he said at the beginning "the best way
>> to refute such scepticism [i.e. synonyms are bad] is with a
>> reproducible test", as if his following test would show otherwise.
>>
>> Yong Huang
>

--
Thomas Kyte (tkyte@oracle.com)             http://asktom.oracle.com/ 
Expert one on one Oracle, programming techniques and solutions for Oracle.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1861004826/  
Opinions are mine and do not necessarily reflect those of Oracle Corp 
Received on Mon Jun 17 2002 - 10:14:25 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US