Re: autoextend size vs. extent size in LMT

From: Norman Dunbar <Norman.Dunbar_at_lfs.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:28:34 +0100
Message-ID: <E2F6A70FE45242488C865C3BC1245DA7023DAA2E@lnewton.leeds.lfs.co.uk>

Hi Niall,

I'm glad to be out from the firewall too ! The problem is, we've done nothing, all of a sudden, everything started working again. I can receive and post again :o) Our gurus have checked it all out and found no config changes etc and are now somewhat puzzled - as they were when we couldn't post/receive becaue 'it should just be working'.

I've sort of been sucked in on this one, and want to find out the answer now, so I'll plod on when I get a chance to do so. Might be interesting, might not.

Cheers,
Norman.

Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:Norman.Dunbar_at_LFS.co.uk

Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com


-------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Niall Litchfield [mailto:n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk] Posted At: Monday, June 17, 2002 2:58 PM Posted To: server
Conversation: autoextend size vs. extent size in LMT Subject: Re: autoextend size vs. extent size in LMT

Morning

Glad to see the firewall's not working!

I agree about the error message which is why I left it in the output.

I must admit I didn't restart everything wth full logging and all the rest
of it because The situation just seems so obviously daft as to warrant logical arguments along the lines advanced by Howard rather than the full
tkprof monty.. Received on Mon Jun 17 2002 - 09:28:34 CDT