Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: The demise of the Oracle professional?

Re: The demise of the Oracle professional?

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 11:03:42 +0100
Message-ID: <1023876186.7912.2.nnrp-12.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

And it was the 'row at a time' issue that I find causes most contention issues,
kicks scalability into touch, and makes the CPU upgrade pretty irrelevant.

--
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Next Seminars
        UK            June / July
        Australia      July / August
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Nuno Souto wrote in message
<3d070cb8$0$28004$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...

>In article <1023865801.19767.0.nnrp-01.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk>, you said
(and I quote):
>>
>> I have to disagree with the last point.
>> "CPU grunt" only addresses scalability
>> in the complete absence of contention.
>

> Relational databases then allowed us to become free from the
>"record at a time" paradigm (something the deranged entity beans want to
>drag us back to...).
>
Received on Wed Jun 12 2002 - 05:03:42 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US