Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: The demise of the Oracle professional?

Re: The demise of the Oracle professional?

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:10:51 +0100
Message-ID: <1023865801.19767.0.nnrp-01.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

I have to disagree with the last point.
"CPU grunt" only addresses scalability
in the complete absence of contention.

To date, I haven't seen many "new tech"
languages, utilities, paradigms, etc. which consider the possibility that they may
introduce high levels of contention. One of the main problems has always been "we've got the CPU to waste to make things easier for ... (insert "programmer", "user", or other preferred sales target).

--
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Next Seminars
        UK            June / July
        Australia      July / August
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Nuno Souto wrote in message
<3d06b2a6$0$28005$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au>...

>In article <ae590c$429gr$1_at_ID-87429.news.dfncis.de>, you said (and I
quote):
>>
>> As I said, J2EE can be applied wherever there is a need for
>> scalability.
>
>Sure. So can more CPU grunt.
>
Received on Wed Jun 12 2002 - 02:10:51 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US