Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: anyone using linux ops cluster as production database?

Re: anyone using linux ops cluster as production database?

From: s.kapitza <skapitza_at_volcanomail.com>
Date: 31 May 2002 04:38:02 -0700
Message-ID: <26703915.0205310338.63586882@posting.google.com>


hello chao_ping

i´m not an expert but i get with the database on our site (OPS 817 on widows 2000) similar tracefiles while the folowing event-s occur :

so i think you could also have a hardware problem.

hth

stefan kapitza

chao_ping <chao_ping_at_163.com> wrote in message news:<3cf32034_at_usenetgateway.com>...
> We have a suse7/oracle 81701 database cluster, and it seems not quite
> stable. After one week or two, one of the ops instance will down, and
> made the whole node reboot. Most of the time, it is the lmon process
> that made the oracle down, thus the node down. I suspect whether my ops
> instance parameter is ok:
>
> lm_locks integer 67414 lm_ress integer 66487 The two node has 2 cpu and
> 1 g memory each. Can someone here using the linux ops post your
> configuration parameter? Thanks. alert log: Thread 1 advanced to log
> sequence 153 Current log# 3 seq# 153 mem# 0: /dev/raw13 Fri May 17
> 02:44:18 2002 LMON: terminating instance due to error 29702 Instance
> terminated by LMON, pid = 573
>
> The following is the trace file of lmon: *** 2002-04-04 20:59:48.511
> kgxggps: proposing substate 5 kgxggcs: Setting state to 8 5. ***
> 2002-04-04 20:59:51.610 Reconfiguration started Synchronization timeout:
> 600 sec List of nodes: 0,1, Lock DB frozen Non-local Process blocks
> cleaned out Non-local Group blocks cleaned out Resources and locks
> cleaned out Resources remastered 21667 Active sendback threshold = 8180
> (tkts) Traffic controller Initialized Communication channels
> reestablished Submitted all rdomain info Submitted all remote-lock
> requests Update rdomain variables Dwn-cvts replayed, VALBLKs dubious ***
> 2002-04-04 21:06:29.540 All grantable locks granted *** 2002-04-04
> 21:06:29.578 Reconfiguration complete *** 2002-05-17 02:44:18.002
> CM:CMRPC: read error occurred: errno=4, rcRead=0, bytesRead=0
> kgxggpoll: skgxn error (12 CMGroupGetLiÛRPC failed status(1)
> respMsg->status(0)) Return code from kjxggpoll: 10 error 29702
> detected in background process
Received on Fri May 31 2002 - 06:38:02 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US