Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 10:47:24 +0100
Message-ID: <3cea17ac$0$8509$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3ce9ff0c$0$15148$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <K_iG8.75146$Po6.120173_at_rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>, you said
> (and I quote):
> > Actually, you misunderstand what Howard is stating. What Howard is
saying
> > is:(chronologically down the page)
>
> No he did not.
>
> You will NEVER get a MSSQL boffin to admit or "understand" a limitation
> of "their" product. Until such limitation is taken away, at which time
> it will be "the first product without that limitation" by definition.

I don't think that is entirely fair. Hang out in microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming for a while. You'll see plenty of talented ,reasonable professionals. It might be true of MS marketing, but then you and I are running unbreakable databases right?

Having said all that it does seem that SQLJoe has been corrected on a number of factual points but doesn't wish to believe the responses. We've all met people like that as well.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
Received on Tue May 21 2002 - 04:47:24 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US