Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Myths- Tablespace placement answered by Oracle

Re: Oracle Myths- Tablespace placement answered by Oracle

From: Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam>
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 00:11:21 +1000
Message-ID: <3ce510a9$0$15144$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


In article <ac2ufu$mcjir$1_at_ID-114862.news.dfncis.de>, you said (and I quote):
>
> The only reliable benchmark is how it runs on your system.

Yupper.

> Even without concurrency in the strictest sense it is still beneficial to
> put the indexes and data on different disks. The above info relates to one
> query. There is nothing to stop multiple queries against the same rows and
> indexes from processing concurrently.
>
> So yes, you can get performance benefit by splitting the data and indexes
> onto different disks."
>

call me a dreamer, but if you put tables and indexes in same tablespace and spread that tablespace over a number of devices you get EXACTLY the same result as above.

;-D

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Fri May 17 2002 - 09:11:21 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US