Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

Re: Newbie's Oracle 9i impression: it sucks

From: Keld Nielsen <keldnielsen_at_image.dk>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 17:43:05 +0200
Message-ID: <evQE8.7955$HN.315678@news010.worldonline.dk>


master-dba ? KBS

"SQLJoe" <sqljoe_at_aol.com> wrote in message news:20020516110809.21498.00000052_at_mb-mv.aol.com...
> I am a MS SQL DBA of five years. Recently, I have been trying to learn
Oracle
> 9i on Windows2000. Here is my impression.
>
> 1)Oracle is SLOW on Windows2000, FAR slower than MS SQL 2000
>
> 2)Oracle uses Java interface which, although cross platform, is slow and
brings
> out the DOS prompt (which remind of legacy applications) everytime I try
to
> open up a GUI.
>
> 3)Believe ir not, Oracle is unstable and unreliable on Windows2000. I had
> Oracle GUI crash on me TWICE already.
>
> 4)Oracle security is overdone. It has multiple layers of security on the
> network level to the application level. Initially, I had a hard time
enterting
> any database, and it took me while to setup the security features.
>
> 4)Setting up a Oracle Client is a nightmare. I need to setup a listener,
port,
> and separate account\pw for the client. Too much work.
>
> 5)The official Oracle books from the Osbourne press absolutely SUCKS. I
have
> read 3 books on Oracle 9i from the Osbourne press and all of them were
next to
> useless. Furthermore, there are very few non-Osbourne books on Oracle 9i
that I
> can currently buy. This is in stark contract to MS SQL 2000 which has
PLENTY of
> GREAT books and documentation (except the ones from OSBOURNE).
>
> 6)Oracle is too complicated. I am willing to bet most Oracle
DBA\Developers
> never use at least 20% of Oracle's features in their entire career. It
seems
> Oracle has a GUI for every little feature it provides, which makes it seem
> disorganized and a nightmare to manage. I think it has around 20 GUIs!!!!.
For
> a database, that is ridiculous.
>
> 7)PL/SQL is overrated. So far, I have seen nothing that PL/SQL can do
which
> T-SQL (with temporary tables and cursors) cannot do. Why would anyone want
to
> learn a SQL language that is, again, needlessly complicated?
>
> I am seriously considering dumping Oracle and learning DB2 instead. What
do you
> think?
>
> Jinsoo
> MCDBA, MCSD, MCSE+I
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu May 16 2002 - 10:43:05 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US