Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> MTS tuning

MTS tuning

From: Pinto <ucanmailme_at_india.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 19:16:04 +0530
Message-ID: <abtoru$1gs$1@news.mch.sbs.de>


Hello All,
Recently we started testing our application after changing our Database from dedicated sever mode to MTS.
I am not very familiar with MTS. i have collected some data by running some scripts that i found in metalink.

MTS related parameters are set as follows

mts_dispatchers                              (protocol=TCP)(dispatchers = 3)
mts_max_dispatchers                           5
mts_servers                                          20
mts_max_servers                                  40

large_pool_size                                    83886080

select name "NAME",OWNED, substr(network,1,15) "PROTOCOL", status "STATUS",
(busy/(busy + idle)) * 100 "%TIME BUSY" from v$dispatcher

NAME OWNED
---- ----------
PROTOCOL




STATUS %TIME BUSY
---------------- ----------
D000         42

(ADDRESS=(PROTO
RECEIVE 47.8563578 D001 41
(ADDRESS=(PROTO
ACCEPT 46.906154 D002 40
(ADDRESS=(PROTO
WAIT 47.5323848

select name "NAME", paddr,requests,(busy/(busy + idle)) * 100 "%TIME BUSY",status from v$shared_server

NAME PADDR          REQUESTS         %TIME BUSY STATUS
----       --------         ----------                 ----------         --
--------------
S000     06E521BC    6029664                 25.1842041     EXEC
S001     06E5280C    7271603                 18.2575696     WAIT(COMMON)
S002     06E52B34    6511361                 17.1122631     WAIT(COMMON)
S003     06E52E5C    4223594                 12.2070631     WAIT(COMMON)
S004     06E53184    2352045                 9.67785749     WAIT(COMMON)
S005     06E534AC     826153                 4.74286627     WAIT(COMMON)
S006     06E537D4     376053                 2.83275286     WAIT(COMMON)
S007     06E53AFC     159785                 1.37010382     WAIT(COMMON)
S008     06E53E24      64173                     .584247999     WAIT(COMMON)
S009     06E5414C      26253                     .320127824     WAIT(COMMON)
S010     06E54474      16667                     .217846538     WAIT(COMMON)

S011     06E5479C       7025                     .140089365     WAIT(COMMON)
S012     06E54AC4       3537                     .101109164     WAIT(COMMON)
S013     06E54DEC       2137                     .080097132     WAIT(COMMON)
S014     06E55114       1685                         .068811734
WAIT(COMMON)
S015     06E5543C       1367                         .060347571
WAIT(COMMON)
S016     06E55764        947                         .051987931
WAIT(COMMON)
S017     06E55A8C        545                         .047238902
WAIT(COMMON)
S018     06E55DB4        424                         .044451358
WAIT(COMMON)
S019     06E560DC        488                         .043019874
WAIT(COMMON) my question is, why aren't all the server process equally busy? looks like, the first 5 server processs are very busy and the others are not. is there anyway where we can ensure that all the server process is equally loaded. or is this the expected behaviour?

select maximum_connections "MAX CONN",servers_started "STARTED", servers_terminated "TERMINATED",servers_highwater "HIGHWATER" from v$mts   MAX CONN STARTED TERMINATED HIGHWATER

we have also found that, after switching to MTS, our CPU usage has almost doubled! and certain applications have slowed down. is it expected or am i missing out something.

also

  1 select p.spid thread, s.username,
  2 decode(nvl(p.background,0),1,bg.description, s.program ) program,
  3 ss.value/100 CPU,physical_reads disk_io from v$process p, v$session s,
  4 v$sesstat ss, v$sess_io si, v$bgprocess bg where s.paddr=p.addr
  5 and ss.sid=s.sid and ss.statistic#=12 and si.sid=s.sid   6* and bg.paddr(+)=p.addr order by ss.value desc 20:25:50 SQL> /

THREAD    USERNAME                       PROGRAM                     CPU
--------- ------------------------------ -------------------- ----------

   DISK_IO


2028      NETMSQLUSERS                   ans.exe                   69.51
     16869

2028      DBO                            Bctsched.exe              65.46
      2008

1512      DBO                            Bctsched.exe              60.47
       163

2028      DBO                            CVCache.exe               32.12
         0

most of the cpu activity is on a single thread (2028). is there anyway we can distribute these loads??

SYSTEM CONFIG: Pentium III dual processor with 1 GB RAM Oracle 8.1.7
Win 2000

thanks and regards,
Pinto. Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 08:46:04 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US