Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: interpreting block dump

Re: interpreting block dump

From: koert54 <koert54_at_nospam.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:44:06 GMT
Message-ID: <G1cE8.78139$Ze.12013@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>


Or for the same paper :
http://www.dbakorea.pe.kr/article/db_block.html

"koert54" <koert54_at_nospam.com> wrote in message news:e0cE8.78136$Ze.12018_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
>
> Good paper on block internals by Dan Hotka
>

http://www.informit.com/isapi/product_id~{3E0BB63F-D402-40CA-A537-AF45CF8475
> A8}/session_id~{72A5501D-3F3B-4C6C-8A4E-AC03E9193238}/content/index.asp
>
> Example of block dump explained (for clustered table)
>
> data block dump (oracle 8.0.4)
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> example cluster block dump
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> object id on block? y
> seg/obj: 0x140 csc: 0x00.9d6 itc: 2 flg: - typ: 1 - data
> fsl: 0 fnx: 0x0 ver: 0x01
>
> itl xid uba flag lck scn/fsc
> 0x01 0x0002.013.00000003 0x00800078.0000.07 c--- 0 scn
> 0x0000.000009d6
> 0x02 0x0002.011.00000003 0x00800077.0000.0f --u- 2 fsc
> 0x0000.000009e0
> ==> --u- flag denotes the rows are committed but no full cleanout has been
> done
>
> data_block_dump
> ===============
> tsiz: 0x7a0 ==> total data area size
> hsiz: 0x1e ==> data header size (16+#tabs*2 + #rows*2)
> pbl: 0x0109f2bc ==> ptr to buffer holding the block
> bdba: 0x00400722 ==> block dba / rdba
> flag=------k-- ==> n=pctfree hit (clusters),f=dont put on freelist
> k=flushable cluster keys
> ntab=2 ==> n tables (>1 so this is a cluster)
> nrow=4 ==> n rows
> frre=-1 ==> first free row index entry, -1=you have to add one
> fsbo=0x1e ==> free space begin offset
> fseo=0x768 ==> free space end offset
> avsp=0x742 ==> available space in the block
> tosp=0x742 ==> total available space when all txs commit
> 0xe:pti[0] nrow=2 offs=0 ==> first table (cluster key) -.
> 0x12:pti[1] nrow=2 offs=2 ==> second table |
> 0x16:pri[0] offs=0x78a | <-----------------------'
> 0x18:pri[1] offs=0x76e |
> 0x1a:pri[2] offs=0x784 <-'
> 0x1c:pri[3] offs=0x768
> block_row_dump:
> tab 0, row 0, @0x78a
> tl: 22 fb: k-h-fl-- lb: 0x0 cc: 1 ==> cluster key
> curc: 1 comc: 1 pk: 0x00400722.0 nk: 0x00400722.0
> ==> curc: current row count for this key in this block
> ==> comc: committed row count for this key in this block
> ==> pk: rowid of previous block for this cluster key.
> ==> nk: rowid of next block for this cluster key.
> ==> ^ blocks are linked in a chain for each key.
> ==> in this example the pk & nk point back to this block so
> ==> this is the only block for this cluster key.
> col 0: [ 2] 52 31 ==> the cluster key value
>
> tab 0, row 1, @0x76e
> tl: 22 fb: k-h-fl-- lb: 0x0 cc: 1
> curc: 1 comc: 1 pk: 0x00400722.1 nk: 0x00400722.1
> col 0: [ 2] 52 32
> ==> this is a second cluster key in this block
>
> tab 1, row 0, @0x784
> tl: 6 fb: -ch-fl-- lb: 0x2 cc: 1 cki: 0
> col 0: [ 1] 61
> ==> this is table data.
> ==> cki: shows us which cluster key this row is for
> tab 1, row 1, @0x768
> tl: 6 fb: -ch-fl-- lb: 0x2 cc: 1 cki: 1
> col 0: [ 1] 61
> ==> table data for the second cluster key
> end_of_block_dump
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "NetComrade" <andreyNSPAM_at_bookexchange.net> wrote in message
> news:3ce14702.92152618_at_news.globix.com...
> > This is a dump of an index block.
> > I need to interpret the actual data (my understanding it should be
> > rowid, col1, col2 (it's a PK on two columns).
> >
> > Any hints, links appreciated.
> >
> > Thanx.
> >
> >
> >
> > *** 2002-05-14 11:12:39.954
> > *** SESSION ID:(1597.11880) 2002-05-14 11:12:39.941
> > Start dump data blocks tsn: 6 file#: 30 minblk 243909 maxblk 243909
> > buffer tsn: 6 rdba: 0x0783b8c5 (30/243909)
> > scn: 0x0000.7e377287 seq: 0x02 flg: 0x00 tail: 0x72870602
> > frmt: 0x02 chkval: 0x0000 type: 0x06=trans data
> >
> > Block header dump: 0x0783b8c5
> > Object id on Block? Y
> > seg/obj: 0x4a38 csc: 0x00.7e020f28 itc: 4 flg: - typ: 2 - INDEX
> > fsl: 0 fnx: 0x0 ver: 0x01
> >
> > Itl Xid Uba Flag Lck
> > Scn/Fsc
> > 0x01 xid: 0x0004.014.0019b136 uba: 0x0081d8c6.5435.02 C--- 0
> > scn 0x0000.7b
> > 260df8
> > 0x02 xid: 0x0006.01c.000202ac uba: 0x0f415996.0422.08 ---- 30
> > fsc 0x050a.00
> > 000000
> > 0x03 xid: 0x0000.000.00000000 uba: 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0
> > fsc 0x0000.00
> > 000000
> > 0x04 xid: 0x0000.000.00000000 uba: 0x00000000.0000.00 ---- 0
> > fsc 0x0000.00
> > 000000
> >
> > Leaf block dump
> > ===============
> > header address 27579884=0x1a4d5ec
> > kdxcolev 0
> > kdxcolok 0
> > kdxcoopc 0x80: opcode=0: iot flags=--- is converted=Y
> > kdxconco 2
> > kdxcosdc 1
> > kdxconro 49
> > kdxcofbo 134=0x86
> > kdxcofeo 1899=0x76b
> > kdxcoavs 1765
> > kdxlespl 0
> > kdxlende 30
> > kdxlenxt 50522048=0x302e7c0
> > kdxleprv 96712106=0x5c3b5aa
> > kdxledsz 6
> > kdxlebksz 3888
> > row#0[1899] flag: ---D-, lock: 2, data:(6): 02 01 96 f0 00 13
> > col 0; len 24; (24):
> > 30 30 32 30 66 30 31 39 63 61 35 35 37 34 33 62 64 30 30 39 37 64 30
> > 33
> > col 1; len 7; (7): 75 73 65 72 5f 69 64
> > row#1[1940] flag: ---D-, lock: 2, data:(6): 02 01 96 f0 00 2c
> > col 0; len 24; (24):
> > 30 30 32 30 66 30 31 39 63 61 35 35 37 34 33 62 64 30 30 39 38 38 30
> > 36
> > col 1; len 7; (7): 75 73 65 72 5f 69 64
> > ...
> > .......
> > We use Oracle 8.1.7.3 on Solaris 2.7 boxes
> > remove NSPAM to email
>
>
Received on Tue May 14 2002 - 12:44:06 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US