Serge Rielau <srielau_at_ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>Does this mean RAC is not a good choice for TPC-C? Or are you only refering to
>federation which I beg to differ from clustering?
>Isn't it one of RACs points that adding small boxes is cheaper than switching
>from the 64CPU box to the 128 CPU box to scale?
On the contrary, there have been some excellent RAC TPC-C figures
published. See for example the Compaq GS320 result. It does help when
the cluster interconnect is a system backplane. :-)
--
Andrew Mobbs - http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~andrewm/
Received on Fri May 10 2002 - 09:43:13 CDT
