Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: lies damn lies and benchmarks

Re: lies damn lies and benchmarks

From: Andrew Mobbs <andrewm_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Date: 09 May 2002 13:22:20 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <KWe*-PPnp@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>


Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote:
>In article <bslC8.377$pa4.220395_at_news.uswest.net>, you said (and I
>quote):
>>
>> Which features does MS SQL not provide that you consider fundamental
>> in an RDBMS?
>
>Not a secret. Read Chris Date's and Ted Codd's 12 rules for RDBMS.

Be careful about mentioning those, Rule 3 in particular (NULL not the same as any other datatype).

>Some:
>Declarative referential integrity would be tops in my list.
>Row locking would be next.
>Readers not blocking writers right up there as well.

I don't see anything in the Codd's rules about lock implementation. It is nice to have these features in a database though.

-- 
Andrew Mobbs - http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~andrewm/
Received on Thu May 09 2002 - 07:22:20 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US