Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Create table statement, weird behavior...
120 extents isn't a big issue, and LMTs
with uniform extents are a good idea.
I tend to prefer a slightly smaller limit
and define a few different classes of
tablespace with different sizes of
uniform extent - like 128k, 1MB, 8MB
64MB, 512MB and then put an object
into a tablespace where it will collect
a couple of dozen extents. If I pick
the wrong tablespace one way
either side I feel embarrassed that
my estimates were poor, but not
sufficiently worried to make a fuss
about moving it.
-- Jonathan Lewis http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk Author of: Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases Next Seminar - Australia - July/August http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html Jim wrote in message ...Received on Wed May 08 2002 - 16:52:23 CDT
>Johathan,
>
> Great site, very helpful link, thankyou...
>
> This is 9i, your link suggest the preference of LMT's. Should I just
>leave well enough alone? I have 1 table with over 120 extents. Would I do
>better to make it "Dictionary Managed"?
>
>Thanks..
>
>Jim
>
>"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:1020887349.24761.0.nnrp-08.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk...
>>
>> Is tablespace DATA a locally managed tablespace ?
>> If so see
>> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/ch_08.html
>>
>>