Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Which one is better? Oracel 9i or DB2 7.2??

Re: Which one is better? Oracel 9i or DB2 7.2??

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 14:52:35 GMT
Message-ID: <TocA8.9857$xv1.249@rwcrnsc51.ops.asp.att.net>


I haven't worked with "the Germans", but have been with several companies who's developers thought this way. Also now working with a company that starts with an S and rhymes with evil and they do nearly the same thing. Jim
"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message news:3cd133f4$0$15475$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> In article <V5Tz8.87695$CH.12075_at_rwcrnsc52.ops.asp.att.net>, you said
> (and I quote):
> > To a degree yes, but I have been places where they did the following
because
> > not all databases did it the same:
> > No Referential integrity
> > no triggers
> > No function based indexes
> > No sequences or auto generated primary keys
> > No stored procedures
> > All text fields that needed to be very large (eg a LOB) were put into a
> > table where the rows were split up in 2K chunks and reassembled for each
> > query to that.
> > No vendor specific builtins (eg functions like nvl or cast) which means
> > almost no functions
> > No joins
> >
>
>
> Why would anyone in their right mind use a database back end and not use
> any of the above is beyond the reach of mere mortals. And quite within
> the grasp of some Germans...
>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu May 02 2002 - 09:52:35 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US