Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Indexed Tablespace Fragmentation

Re: Indexed Tablespace Fragmentation

From: Jonathan Lewis <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 22:53:09 +0100
Message-ID: <1020117147.18578.0.nnrp-12.9e984b29@news.demon.co.uk>

There's a difference between

    extents per segment
and

    extents per tablespace

One reason I like to keep extents per segment quite low (ideally a few dozen, worst case a couple of hundred) is to ensure that the tablespace as a whole doesn't end up
with huge number of extents.

--
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk

Author of:
Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases

Next Seminar - Australia - July/August
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html

Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html



Niall Litchfield wrote in message
<3ccda888$0$231$cc9e4d1f_at_news.dial.pipex.com>...

>
>I'll live with up to (say) 1000 extents in an lmt (though truthfully more
>than 300 or so gets my goat). I guess I'm saying a couple of hundred seems
>conservative.
>
>
>--
>Niall Litchfield
>Oracle DBA
>Audit Commission UK
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 29 2002 - 16:53:09 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US