Re: file placement and SAN

I have had SAN experience . . . what is the question?

Sean M wrote:

>Michael Brown wrote:
>
>>Thanks. I will say that your 'db file sequential read' averages about
>>1/10 of what I had seen before.
>>
>
>Maybe so, but the values aren't much different than the same database
>running in production on direct-attached disk. NAS, when pushed, will
>always be slower and look slower in tests, etc. But for real-world,
>end-user perception of "fast," we haven't seen that serious a
>degredation. When factored against all the other advantages of NAS, the
>choice is pretty easy for our needs.
>
>>One thing I forgot to ask was, what
>>is you db_file_multiblock_read_count (kind of important for
>>interpreting the scattered read result)?
>>
>
>8.
>
>Thanks,
>Sean
>
Received on Fri Apr 26 2002 - 20:41:21 CDT