Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: separate data/inidex

Re: separate data/inidex

From: Nuno Souto <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 17:54:03 +1000
Message-ID: <3cc7b70b$0$15473$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au>


In article <aa83v9029oi_at_drn.newsguy.com>, you said (and I quote):
> >
> >This myth has been around for a long time - and unfortunately was actually
> >started by an Oracle consultant (who will remain nameless).
>
> And it wasn't me!

Proof?
:-D

Narh, I think I know who it was. Mind you, back then it probably made a lot of sense. Problem with all these "gospel" statements is that they tend to be self-perpetuating. Which in a technical arena like IT is a recipe for disaster! Like Jonathan recognizes in his book, there is no such thing as a technical recommendation that remains valid ad infinitum.

Reminds me of many "benchmarks", heavily promoted here as the be-all-and- end-all of performance evaluations. These were originally developed to make a Version 5 Oracle database run fast in a mainframe, period. Never meant to be then sold as "tests" for V6 and V7 databases. For obvious reasons. Yet they were sold as such, and promoted as the ultimate by all and sundry including Oracle Consultancy!

Oh well, one day people will learn not to look for silver bullets...

-- 
Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu Apr 25 2002 - 02:54:03 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US