Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

From: David Fitzjarrell <oratune_at_msn.com>
Date: 22 Apr 2002 13:42:34 -0700
Message-ID: <32d39fb1.0204221242.88ad3bf@posting.google.com>


Whatever 'extra-terrestirial bugs' are ... can't find those in my Webster's anywhere ...

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com> wrote in message news:<PIUw8.106137$CH1.93419_at_sccrnsc02>...
> "Joe Yong" <flyingbuick_at_yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:6ad26002.0204212254.2813bf7c_at_posting.google.com...
> <snip>
> > manage the apps) and the same applies to sqlserver. Even NASA software
> > have bugs (I know a few personally).
> >
> >
> > joe.
>
> Would those be extra-terrestirial bugs? :-)
> Jim
> >
> >
> > Isaac Keslassy <keslassy_at_nospam.stanford.edu> wrote in message
> news:<3CC109C4.E7F5C2C1_at_nospam.stanford.edu>...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to use a database with about 10 Gbytes and 25 million
> > > lines. This would be via Intranet (IIS server).
> > >
> > > Would you know where I could find results of benchmark tests comparing
> > > the performances of SQL server vs. Oracle with a similar database?
> > > (answer speed, memory needed, etc.)
> > > Given your experience, what would be the main pros and cons for each
> > > solution?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Isaac
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 15:42:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US