Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

If that's what you want just ask a question that is clearly answered in the manual. Something like:

"I just installed Oracle on my new Solaris server and I am getting the message ORA-03113 when I try to connect. What's wrong."

Of course it will be a race to see whether, due to time zones, Sybrand gets there before others. So time your posting well.

Daniel Morgan

stinky wrote:

> Sybrand Bakker wrote:
>
> >Isaac Keslassy <keslassy_at_nospam.stanford.edu> wrote in message news:<3CC109C4.E7F5C2C1_at_nospam.stanford.edu>...
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I would like to use a database with about 10 Gbytes and 25 million
> >>lines. This would be via Intranet (IIS server).
> >>
> >>Would you know where I could find results of benchmark tests comparing
> >>the performances of SQL server vs. Oracle with a similar database?
> >>(answer speed, memory needed, etc.)
> >>Given your experience, what would be the main pros and cons for each
> >>solution?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Isaac
> >>
> >
> >PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEE
> >NOT AGAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
> >
> >Don't you learn how to search Usenet archives at Stanford?
> >Or are you just lazy?
> >Please search for the infamous word sqlserver in this newsgroup at
> >groups.google.com and start reading all those flamewars.
> >Your question will inevitably result in another one.
> >
>
> I can't wait to get flamed by Sy. Only until then will I feel like a
> true member of this newsgroup.
>
> Keep up the good work, Sy. You say what we all think.
>
> >
> >
> >
> >Regards
> >
> >Sybrand Bakker
> >Senior Oracle DBA
> >
Received on Mon Apr 22 2002 - 11:26:25 CDT