Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

Sybrand Bakker wrote:

>Isaac Keslassy <keslassy_at_nospam.stanford.edu> wrote in message news:<3CC109C4.E7F5C2C1_at_nospam.stanford.edu>...
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I would like to use a database with about 10 Gbytes and 25 million
>>lines. This would be via Intranet (IIS server).
>>
>>Would you know where I could find results of benchmark tests comparing
>>the performances of SQL server vs. Oracle with a similar database?
>>(answer speed, memory needed, etc.)
>>Given your experience, what would be the main pros and cons for each
>>solution?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Isaac
>>
>
>PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEE
>NOT AGAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
>
>Don't you learn how to search Usenet archives at Stanford?
>Or are you just lazy?
>Please search for the infamous word sqlserver in this newsgroup at
>groups.google.com and start reading all those flamewars.
>Your question will inevitably result in another one.
>

I can't wait to get flamed by Sy. Only until then will I feel like a true member of this newsgroup.

Keep up the good work, Sy. You say what we all think.

>
>
>
>Regards
>
>Sybrand Bakker
>Senior Oracle DBA
>
Received on Sat Apr 20 2002 - 15:36:16 CDT