Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

Re: Oracle vs. SQL server

From: Jim Kennedy <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:12:53 GMT
Message-ID: <Vzfw8.90958$CH1.80380@sccrnsc02>


Probably a student and worse yet probably training to be in management (see trying to delegate his research ) or worse yet marketing! Jim
"Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message news:a20d28ee.0204200307.5b8defaa_at_posting.google.com...
> Isaac Keslassy <keslassy_at_nospam.stanford.edu> wrote in message
news:<3CC109C4.E7F5C2C1_at_nospam.stanford.edu>...
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to use a database with about 10 Gbytes and 25 million
> > lines. This would be via Intranet (IIS server).
> >
> > Would you know where I could find results of benchmark tests comparing
> > the performances of SQL server vs. Oracle with a similar database?
> > (answer speed, memory needed, etc.)
> > Given your experience, what would be the main pros and cons for each
> > solution?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Isaac
>
>

PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEE

> NOT
AGAIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

>
> Don't you learn how to search Usenet archives at Stanford?
> Or are you just lazy?
> Please search for the infamous word sqlserver in this newsgroup at
> groups.google.com and start reading all those flamewars.
> Your question will inevitably result in another one.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Sybrand Bakker
> Senior Oracle DBA
Received on Sat Apr 20 2002 - 10:12:53 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US