Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9iDB Security Hole?

Re: 9iDB Security Hole?

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 09:08:34 +0100
Message-ID: <3cbbdc03$0$8513$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


Um yes I wasn't thinking clearly. It may well also be a reason to avoid deployment of new systems on 9.0.1. (unless you can avoid creating users with create session and create view.).

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
"Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan_at_jlcomp.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1018943025.13037.0.nnrp-08.9e984b29_at_news.demon.co.uk...

>
> In fact, there is a bug, which I couldn't find
> last night - 2121935, dated December 2002 !!!
>
> Any ANSI join is a problem.
>
> But this isn't a reason for avoid ANSI syntax,
> it's a reason for not migrating a production
> system to 9.0.1
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Lewis
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
>
> Author of:
> Practical Oracle 8i: Building Efficient Databases
>
> Next Seminar - Australia - July/August
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
>
> Host to The Co-Operative Oracle Users' FAQ
> http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
>
>
>
> Niall Litchfield wrote in message
> <3cbbd589$0$238$ed9e5944_at_reading.news.pipex.net>...
> >"Daniel Morgan" <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com> wrote in message
> >news:3CBB5EFC.43A50425_at_exesolutions.com...
> >> And no one other than sys should be looking at sys.link$ anyway.
> >
> >This is the whole point of the thread. As described so far the use of
LEFT
> >OUTER JOIN in 9i means that any user with create session privilege can
look
> >at data from any table that exists in the database.
> >
> >Has someone filed a bug on this yet? This looks like a good reason to
avoid
> >the ANSI syntax for a while yet.
> >
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 16 2002 - 03:08:34 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US