Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle on Intel vs. Oracle on Sparc

Re: Oracle on Intel vs. Oracle on Sparc

From: Vladimir M. Zakharychev <bob_at_dpsp-yes.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:28:46 +0400
Message-ID: <a9gg80$m72$1@babylon.agtel.net>


3) is ok if you have a linux geek in your ranks. As I said, linux's getting better every day - it's pretty stable, it can do clustering, it takes substantially less resources than windows, it is remotely manageable and it's kinda unix after all :) But judging on the number of posts here regarding oracle on linux installation and other problems, I suspect it's not just ready for the prime time... Besides, Dan Morgan is correct when he says that you can get used Sun or HP hardware pretty cheap these days, and a lot of these systems come with support. I was also getting some, should I say, spam regarding this matter - they offered refurbished systems with support for just a fraction of original price...

--
Vladimir Zakharychev (bob@dpsp-yes.com)                http://www.dpsp-yes.com
Dynamic PSP(tm) - the first true RAD toolkit for Oracle-based internet applications.
All opinions are mine and do not necessarily go in line with those of my employer.


"Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield_at_dial.pipex.com> wrote in message
news:3cbb3765$0$233$cc9e4d1f_at_news.dial.pipex.com...

> "Vladimir M. Zakharychev" <bob_at_dpsp-yes.com> wrote in message
> news:a9f5vq$bu3$1_at_babylon.agtel.net...
> rearranged (hopefully for clarity)
> > > Four Options:
> > > 1. Oracle on Solaris on Sparc Sun Servers
> > > 2. Oracle on Solaris on Intel Dell Servers
> > > 3. Oracle on Linux on Intel Dell Servers
> > > 4. Oracle on Windows 2000 on Intel Dell Servers
> > As I heard, Larry Ellison is betting his business on Intel/Linux - call
> your
> > Oracle rep and ask if he/she can confirm this.
> I'll believe it when I see it. Sales reps will confirm it two or three years
> afterwards.
> > 2) is not an option as Oracle discontinued support for x86 Solaris.
> > 4) is more expensive than 2), but if you trust Microsoft more than RedHat
> > and are willing to pay extra $$$ for server OS license and a bit more
> > server memory - that's your choice then.
> No comment on 3)?
>
> I'd also add that Solaris is NOT Linux which is NOT Win32. How much are the
> training and support costs of platform switching going to cost you compared
> to the hardware and os license.
>
>
> --
> Niall Litchfield
> Oracle DBA
> Audit Commission UK
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 16 2002 - 01:28:46 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US