Re: what is your opinion about oracle replication?

From: Hieraklion <hieraklion_at_noos.fr>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 15:29:53 +0200
Message-ID: <3CBAD5D1.3010707@noos.fr>

"Bonjour" from Paris (France).

It depends the need to have. Replication is usefull in order to maintain data in several sites and u need to access to these datas geographically in differents places. The choice between synchronous or asynchronous, number of masters ... depends of u need.

However, if you need to maintain a high avaibility architecture : use stand-by database or OPS ( i don't remember the term in 9i database). Replication is not the method to garantee a HA Oracle architecture.

"Au revoir" from Paris
Hieraklion

chao_ping wrote:

>Hi, We are considering whether we should use replication in oracle
>system, to satisfy our enviroment. Not sure whether using dblink is
>better or refer to oracle replication. So, dear dbas, what about your
>experience about replication? Is it a good product? Is it stable? I need
>suggestion from your all.:) Thanks.
>
>
>
>--
>an oracle fan,
>an oracle beginner
>
>Posted via dBforums
>http://dbforums.com
>
Received on Mon Apr 15 2002 - 08:29:53 CDT