Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 16084 block size

Re: 16084 block size

From: koert54 <koert54_at_nospam.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 21:20:26 GMT
Message-ID: <uWIs8.8502$Ze.2479@afrodite.telenet-ops.be>


are you sure you didn't make the same typo in dbassist ?

"Julien DARMONT" <xela2_at_NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message news:3cb3576e$0$5004$626a54ce_at_news.free.fr...
> yes sorry... I would like to say 16384...
> Have you an idea? :)
>
>
>
> "koert54" <koert54_at_nospam.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
> SsIs8.8409$Ze.2505_at_afrodite.telenet-ops.be...
> > 16*1024=16384 not 16084
> >
> > "Julien DARMONT" <xela2_at_NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:3cb35163$0$4993$626a54ce_at_news.free.fr...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a problem when creating a database with dbassist (I'm using
> Oracle
> > > 8.1.6 with Solaris 2.8).
> > > I have the ORA-01034 ORACLE not available when dbassist try to create
> the
> > > database files.
> > > It works perfectly with block size of 2048, 4096, 8192 but not with
> > 16084!!!
> > > I think it is because of shared memory and semaphore configuration in
> > > /etc/system.
> > > I used the Oracle recommandation values (and try to increment them a
> > little)
> > > but it doesn't work.
> > >
> > > Does someones have any clue?
> > >
> > > Thank you in advance
> > >
> > > Julien
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 09 2002 - 16:20:26 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US