Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: L:ist - Can do/do better in MS SQL than Oracle

Re: L:ist - Can do/do better in MS SQL than Oracle

From: chris <chris_at_fin2000.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:04:38 -0800
Message-ID: <e3bTBhb1BHA.1888@tkmsftngp04>


http://microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/compare/default.asp "sandiyan" <sandiyan_at_yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message news:69e9c64b.0203270941.5b05708e_at_posting.google.com...
> I am been tasked to get a list:
>
> - that contain points that MS SQL will support but not Oracle...
>
> - that contain points that MS SQL will do better than Oracle...
>
> Points can be based on:
> Operatability...(from a DBA point of view)
> Backup/Restore
> Transact vs PL SQL language
> Cursors
> Security
> Instances/Clusters(Real Application clusteres)
> Performance
> etc...
>
> I have got meeting with Oracle consultants and need some points so
> that I can judge whether it is really worth moving to Oracle...
>
>
> Thanks,
> NM
Received on Wed Mar 27 2002 - 12:04:38 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US