Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RI - pros and cons

Re: RI - pros and cons

From: damorgan <damorgan_at_exesolutions.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 22:16:13 GMT
Message-ID: <3C9BAD30.3BD9D1C9@exesolutions.com>


And then you get those nasty problems like "it doesn't scale", "it is not secure", and "it performs like road kill".

Daniel Morgan

Connor McDonald wrote:

> Don Smy wrote:
> >
> > A major drawback of using RI is that it tends to make your application
> > database vendor specific. If you intend building apps that will be used by
> > different brands of databases I'd say putting the RI in your app is a good
> > thing.
> >
> > Another reason for not using RI is that RI is designed to stop people who
> > aren't experts from doing stupid things. Quite often there are very good
> > reasons for circumventing RI in the application (particularly during data
> > conversion projects or providing data importing facilities). For conversions
> > I guess you could just drop the constraints, do the conversion and then put
> > them back on. For importing it may not be that easy.
> >
> > If none of these issues apply to your environment then I think your DBA just
> > doesn't like work....
>
> This may be true...but I've found that any product that is developed to
> be database-independent generally ends up running poorly on all the
> target platforms. And you get great things like:
>
> "Yes its database independent, but you have to use ODBC drivers from
> company X, and is has to be deployed on Windows version Y"
>
> which makes the "independent" concept somewhat moot.
>
> hth
> connor
> --
> ==============================
> Connor McDonald
>
> http://www.oracledba.co.uk
>
> "Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue..."
Received on Fri Mar 22 2002 - 16:16:13 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US