Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle versus Microsoft Sqlserver 2000

Re: Oracle versus Microsoft Sqlserver 2000

From: damorgan <dan.morgan_at_ci.seattle.wa.us>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:09:49 GMT
Message-ID: <3C72BF2C.D3B15AC3@ci.seattle.wa.us>


I probably shouldn't note this ... but SQL Server and Sybase didn't even make the list and Informix did. I wonder what that means.

But even with my limited German ... I'd say it is a definite vote for Oracle in the RDBMS sector. Higher compensation and demand for resources means never having to say you're broke. Anyone know of a web site with similar numbers for North America, South America, Australia, New Zealand, or Japan?

Daniel Morgan

Serge Rielau wrote:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Here is some "meter" for the German Freelance IT market (basic German skills
> required):
> http://www.gulp.de/kb/tools/gulpometer/pdb.html#Datenbanken
>
> The third column is the avg, hourly rate (in EURO), next column is total #
> requests,
> then follows the percentage w.r.t. total (compared to previous month).
> After that the number of freelancers availables vs. registered.
> The scale compares the market requirements (N) with available resources (A).
> 'A' heavy means comparatively many resources
> 'N' heavy means comparatively high demands
>
> Cheers
> Serge
> --
> Serge Rielau
> DB2 UDB SQL Compiler Development
> IBM Software Lab, Canada
Received on Tue Feb 19 2002 - 15:09:49 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US