Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is using OPTIMAL in RBS ORA-1555 prone?
But then if I don't I'll eventually get an ORA-1650 unable to extend
rollback segment
I'll have to manually shrink my rollback segments, won't I? I just can't let them grow forever...
What is your approach with this?
Thanks
-- Syltrem http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site - en français) To reply to myself directly, remove .spammenot from my address "damorgan" <dan.morgan_at_ci.seattle.wa.us> a écrit dans le message de news: 3C714542.22B587A0_at_ci.seattle.wa.us...Received on Tue Feb 19 2002 - 08:13:51 CST
> Yes. And you are also more likely to generate needless overhead. It is a
syntax
> I never use.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
>
>
> Syltrem wrote:
>
> > If using OPTIMAL setting in the rollback segments, am I more likely to
have
> > ORA-1555 snapshot too old?
> >
> > That is, Oracle will shrink the rollback segment at the start af any new
> > transaction, so it may thus drop information required by that other
> > long-running process.
> >
> > Even so, you can never tell when a rbs extent will be reused so how can
you
> > make 100% sure you will not get this error? Users get it every couple of
> > weeks and I can't do an alter session use rollback segment xxxx in this
> > application.
> >
> > Any suggestions appreciated.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Syltrem
> > http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site - en
français)
> > To reply to myself directly, remove .spammenot from my address
>