Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Is using OPTIMAL in RBS ORA-1555 prone?

Re: Is using OPTIMAL in RBS ORA-1555 prone?

From: Syltrem <syltrem_at_videotron.spammenot.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 09:13:51 -0500
Message-ID: <A4tc8.24$a04.147@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>


But then if I don't I'll eventually get an ORA-1650 unable to extend rollback segment

I'll have to manually shrink my rollback segments, won't I? I just can't let them grow forever...

What is your approach with this?

Thanks

--

Syltrem
http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site - en français)
To reply to myself directly, remove .spammenot from my address

"damorgan" <dan.morgan_at_ci.seattle.wa.us> a écrit dans le message de news:
3C714542.22B587A0_at_ci.seattle.wa.us...

> Yes. And you are also more likely to generate needless overhead. It is a
syntax
> I never use.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
>
>
> Syltrem wrote:
>
> > If using OPTIMAL setting in the rollback segments, am I more likely to
have
> > ORA-1555 snapshot too old?
> >
> > That is, Oracle will shrink the rollback segment at the start af any new
> > transaction, so it may thus drop information required by that other
> > long-running process.
> >
> > Even so, you can never tell when a rbs extent will be reused so how can
you
> > make 100% sure you will not get this error? Users get it every couple of
> > weeks and I can't do an alter session use rollback segment xxxx in this
> > application.
> >
> > Any suggestions appreciated.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Syltrem
> > http://pages.infinit.net/syltrem (OpenVMS related web site - en
français)
> > To reply to myself directly, remove .spammenot from my address
>
Received on Tue Feb 19 2002 - 08:13:51 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US