Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Sizes of "large tables"

Re: Sizes of "large tables"

From: Marc Blum <marc_at_marcblum.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:39:15 GMT
Message-ID: <3c6c2d61.9299451@news.online.de>


Have a look at

http://www.wintercorp.com

There I found a white paper about a 80 Terabyte Database, realized as a Proof-of-Concept at British Telecom

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:34:02 GMT, "John A. Crow" <crowja_at_mediaone.net> wrote:

>
>I would like to hear from folks on the sizes of tables that
>currently are considered large.
>
>Since there are so many things that effect the "size" of a
>table, I guess I could say I am interested in rather simple
>tables --- varchars, integers, etc., no BLOBs, and the number
>of records in these tables. It seems that places like Google
>would have absolutely *huge* tables, and I've seen mentioned
>in this NG tables of 250 M rows.
>
>Will summarize and post.
>
>Thanks -
>
> - John

regards
Marc Blum
mailto:marc_at_marcblum.de
http://www.marcblum.de Received on Thu Feb 14 2002 - 15:39:15 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US