Re: Oracle Server on Windows NT Cluster

<gr>
Some excellent points Daniel, and I totally agree. I was just pokin' a bit of fun at Sybrand since I've noticed that he takes those questions quite personally, and is apt to point out exactly what those versions' current support level is at: zilch.

Yours in fun,

Bricklen

;-D

damorgan wrote:
>
> Actually they bother many of us ....
>
> Not so much when some poor sucker gets stuck maintaining an old system and has no
> choice. But more so when someone is installing software that you know
>
> (A) they didn't buy in the last three years because Oracle hasn't solid it since
> the early 90s.
> (B) they will get no support from Oracle for the software.
> (C) they will come to this group asking questions when there is little or nothing
> we can do to help them.
> (D) when the bugs they are working with have been dealt with in a subsequent
> release.
> And, finally,
> (E) when you know perfectly well they are working on a resume that will make them
> as employable as someone with 20 years of COBOL or ALGOL experience.
>
> Daniel Morgan
>
> Bricklen Anderson wrote:
>
> > Posts about older versions of Oracle really get your goat don't they Sybrand?
> >
> > ;-D
> >
> > >
> > > 8.0.5 is desupported
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
> > >
> > > To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Wed Feb 13 2002 - 20:44:33 CST