Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: 9i RAC and Shared Server Mode vs. Dedicated Server Mode

Re: 9i RAC and Shared Server Mode vs. Dedicated Server Mode

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:13:54 -0800
Message-ID: <VqCa8.42$EC3.873@inet-nntp1.oracle.com>


I'd like to know why. Every RAC Install I've done has used dedicated server and worked perfectly. I don't know of any reason why Shared Server would be preferred over dedicated unless you have a memory shortage.

--
HTH.  Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete
Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram"

"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook

"Oh no, it's not.  It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA

"Neil Boemio" <neil.boemio_at_gecapital.com> wrote in message
news:9dfce6cc.0202121731.4e887892_at_posting.google.com...

> FYI ... I was just told by Oracle to use Shared Server Mode when using
RAC.
>
> ******************
> "Pete Sharman" <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com> wrote in message
news:<hnS98.6$ap6.37_at_inet-nntp1.oracle.com>...
> > Nope. There is no requirement to run Shared Server just because you're
> > running RAC.
> >
> > --
> > HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.
> >
> > Pete
> > Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram"
> >
> > "Controlling developers is like herding cats."
> > Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
> >
> > "Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
> > Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
> >
> > "Neil Boemio" <neil.boemio_at_gecapital.com> wrote in message
> > news:9dfce6cc.0202100943.1f7b8140_at_posting.google.com...
> > > I believe I read somewhere that when using RAC, the database should be
> > > operated in Shared Server Mode (multi-threaded) as opposed to
> > > Dedicated Server Mode.
> > >
> > > Is this true even when I know that I will NOT have a large number of
> > > users connected simultaneously?
Received on Wed Feb 13 2002 - 17:13:54 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US