Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> achivelog strange behaviour of archiver
HiYa
having a strange thing happen on a linux machine that I set up and got Oracle running on.
I had set it up, to run and test archive log operation, and generally mucked about with it for a while, getting to understand what I was doing and learning on. Based on this I then set up the environments on another machine and all are running as I understand they should.
Then I came back to the first machine, and tried to test my backup scripts, and found that it does not operate as I expect (while the other machine does)
Eg
with the database in ARCHIVELOG mode
(select log_mode from v$database) and with the archiver process going
(manually started with alter system archive log start)
I can see process called ora_lgwr_$ORACLE_SID and ora_arc0_$ORACLE_SID
and with the entries in init$ORACLE_SID.ora
log_archive_dest = "/u01/app/oracle/admin/DEV/arch" log_archive_format = arch_%t_%s.arc background_dump_dest = /u01/app/oracle/admin/DEV/bdump user_dump_dest = /u01/app/oracle/admin/DEV/udump
I would have thought that I was home and hosed. BUT
when I issue a command
alter system switch logfile;
from sqlplus I get a file placed in $oracle_home/dbs/ called (for example) arch1_93.dbf
fushigi da naaa!!
not only is the location odd, but also the name, as the name does not have the leading _ before the %t attribute
strangely enough when I do the above on the other linux machine I get the file placed into the log_archive_dest location
also just now, I noticed that log_archive_dest has "" surrounding the value but user_dump_dest and background_dump_dest do not.
this is the same on the machine that works as I expected
any suggestions welcome
(Ohhh ... to all those who have given me answerers and advice so far
thankyou very much it has been a very interesting 2 weeks of learning
and I feel that I am just at the stage where I can be genuinely dangerous
if let loose without a leash ... another year and I may be a DBA ;-)
thanks again folks Received on Thu Feb 07 2002 - 23:34:09 CST