Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: Oracle Listener
That's correct ...
Look at v$session & v$process tables and you will see that remote clients come thru the port:socket combination other than 1521...
My two cents' worth..
JP seo
Alex Filonov wrote:
> Christopher Luther wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Our NT based Oracle 8.1.7 lister looks for connections on TCP 1521.
> > However, when a client requests a connection, the final TCP port negotiated
> > is something other than TCP 1521. I do not see this behavior under UNIX.
> > is there some way to configure Oracle 8.1.7 under NT to not port-hop and
> > stick to TCP 1521 as does our UNIX-based Oracle server?
> >
>
> It's the same behavior everywhere, NT, UNIX doesn't matter. Port listed in
> listener.ora (1521 in your case) is used for initial handshake only. Listener
> creates dynamic port afterwards and all further communication is going through
> that dynamic port. I think it's documented in Network Administration.
>
> >
> > --
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > L. Christopher Luther
> > Technical Consultant
> > Xybernaut Solutions, Inc.
> > (703) 506-0400 x230
> > cluther_at_xybernaut.com
> > http://www.xybernaut.com/selfware/selfware.htm
> >
> > My PGP Public Key:
> > http://keyserver.pgp.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x21261B88
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This communication contains
> > information that is confidential and/or legally privileged.
> > This information is intended only for the use of the individual
> > or entity named on this communication. If you are not the
> > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> > copying, distribution, printing or other use of, or any action
> > in reliance on, the contents of this communication is strictly
> > prohibited. If you receive this communication in error, please
> > immediately notify us by telephone at (703) 506-0400.
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > Unsolicited commercial e-mail will automatically be reported
> > to the appropriate abuse@ - without exception.
Received on Wed Feb 06 2002 - 23:20:33 CST