Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: RAC vs OPS

Re: RAC vs OPS

From: Pete Sharman <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:00:01 -0800
Message-ID: <gQd68.5$8X1.84@inet-nntp1.oracle.com>


Nuno

If you search through the newsgroup for RAC, you'll see a detailed explanation I sent of how this works. I'm too lazy to type it again so you'll have to do the search yourself! ;)

--
HTH.  Additions and corrections welcome.

Pete
Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram"

"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook

"Oh no, it's not.  It's much harder than that!"
Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA

"Nuno Souto" <nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam> wrote in message
news:3c5933b5.4683539_at_news-vip.optusnet.com.au...

> Howard J. Rogers doodled thusly:
>
> >One word (OK, two then!): cache fusion. Transferring a block from one
node
> >to another is now around 100 times faster than it was in OPS, because
there
> >is no block pinging to disk.
> >
>
>
> I still can't get my head around that one... I know it is supposed to
> have been verified to work, but I'd like to see it. Not the 100 times
> bit, the no block pinging bit.
>
> Cheers
> Nuno Souto
> nsouto_at_optushome.com.au.nospam
Received on Thu Jan 31 2002 - 10:00:01 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US