ONly if your use asynchorous replication. Synchorous replicationn is
not for high availability.
Mark Malakanov <markmal_no_spam_at_home.com> wrote in message news:<3C54485C.2080100_at_home.com>...
> AR is suitable for disaster scenario of high availability.
> Be ready to loose a performance up to several times. It depends - if you
> have frequent short transactions (OLTP) the losses will be huge.
>
> Mark
>
>
> A Wong wrote:
>
> > How does AR rank for a high availability setup? (ver. 8.1.6)
> > I only have the standard edition, so can't do that much anyways. I've also
> > got disk mirroring in place, so I'm a little worried about a performance
> > drop. There's a program my company is thinking of getting, Double-Take,
> > which helps create a hot spare, but AR provides a bit of load-balancing, but
> > AR might have reduced performance...don't know...
> >
> >
> >
Received on Mon Jan 28 2002 - 10:46:17 CST
