Or maybe Quest should have set a more reasonable price. I could and would
shell out $100/yr for the tool, and might be able to justify $200, but $800
is way too rich for my blood, so I use the free version.
"Sybrand Bakker" <postbus_at_sybrandb.demon.nl> wrote in message
news:rel35ug1ag77dd80b4f9bg1e2jbcc2tord_at_4ax.com...
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:33:35 GMT, "Marc Weinstock_at_si.rr.com"
> <Marc-Weinstock_at_si.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Toad is great, but it was better when the latest and complete version of
> >Toad was free. Now you either pay Quest $800 for the latest and greatest
or
> >have a version that is 1 release older for free.
>
>
> Obviously you think no one should have to pay for software. But Quest
> does pay their developers to enhance the product, don't they?
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Sybrand Bakker, Senior Oracle DBA
>
> To reply remove -verwijderdit from my e-mail address
Received on Fri Jan 25 2002 - 16:44:11 CST
