Re: Oracle versus Sqlserver

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <a2ffm2$b2h$1@knossos.btinternet.com>

"Jim Kennedy" <kennedy-family_at_attbi.com> wrote in message news:sxk28.7913$5Z6.130838_at_rwcrnsc54...
>Unless they (ms) ported hotmail
> recently it has been on UNIX since they acquired the company.

http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/graph/?mode_u=off&mode_w=on&site=www.hotmail.c om

which I know is the website but I believe the mailservers are exch2k now as well.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK

Received on Sun Jan 20 2002 - 16:17:39 CST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: vob: "oracle 9i dba upgrade exam"
Previous message: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Archive Log affects performance?"
In reply to: Jim Kennedy: "Re: Oracle versus Sqlserver"
Next in thread: Steffen Ramlow: "Re: Oracle versus Sqlserver"
Reply: Steffen Ramlow: "Re: Oracle versus Sqlserver"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US