Re: To much memory for...

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:47:33 -0000, "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote:

>"Brian Tkatch" <SPAMBLOCK.Maxwell_Smart_at_ThePentagon.com.SPAMBLOCK> wrote in
>message news:3c42f85c.546989813_at_news.alt.net...
>> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:49:52 -0000, "Niall Litchfield"
>> <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >Actually I'm sure that Sybrand is merely suffering from the deranged
>belief
>> >that people will
>> >
>> >a) Read the 500 or so pages of the Concepts manual.
>> >b) Consider the appropriateness of the tools they have for the job at
>hand.
>> >
>> >I must admit this is more of a hope for me now than an expectation.
>> >
>> >FWIW I would never recommend Oracle (even lite) for single table
>databases
>> >on a laptop. Access pretty much has that market sewn up.
>>
>> Too bad SuperBase isn;t as well known.
>
>Fair enough. Mind you it always surprises people when a guy who is known as
>an Oracle guy recommends an MS product. Apparently i'm supposed to take the
>same line towards MS as Larry does.

I'm not against it. I just SuperBase to late. Nice product though.

I too recommend Access to people for small projects. If you can put up with its idiosyncracies, its a nice product.

Brian Received on Tue Jan 15 2002 - 08:23:53 CST