Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> Re: To much memory for...

Re: To much memory for...

From: Niall Litchfield <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:47:33 -0000
Message-ID: <3c43fab6$0$8511$ed9e5944@reading.news.pipex.net>


"Brian Tkatch" <SPAMBLOCK.Maxwell_Smart_at_ThePentagon.com.SPAMBLOCK> wrote in message news:3c42f85c.546989813_at_news.alt.net...
> On Mon, 14 Jan 2002 08:49:52 -0000, "Niall Litchfield"
> <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> >Actually I'm sure that Sybrand is merely suffering from the deranged
belief
> >that people will
> >
> >a) Read the 500 or so pages of the Concepts manual.
> >b) Consider the appropriateness of the tools they have for the job at
hand.
> >
> >I must admit this is more of a hope for me now than an expectation.
> >
> >FWIW I would never recommend Oracle (even lite) for single table
databases
> >on a laptop. Access pretty much has that market sewn up.
>
> Too bad SuperBase isn;t as well known.

Fair enough. Mind you it always surprises people when a guy who is known as an Oracle guy recommends an MS product. Apparently i'm supposed to take the same line towards MS as Larry does.

--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission UK
*****************************************
Please include version and platform
and SQL where applicable
It makes life easier and increases the
likelihood of a good answer

******************************************
Received on Tue Jan 15 2002 - 03:47:33 CST

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US