Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> c.d.o.server -> REPOST: Re: Oracle 9i with 8i OCP track possible?
"Howard J. Rogers" <dba_at_hjrdba.com> wrote in message
news:3c2f694d$0$2602$afc38c87_at_news.optusnet.com.au...
> I wouldn't recommend it. But then I'm whistling in the wind here, because
> everyone else assures me that the differences between 8i and 9i are not
that
> major. Personally, and speaking only for myself, I think that's wrong.
I agree entirely with Howard. 9i is a significant step forward and in some respects a different animal to 8i. Especially if you compare 9i to 8.1.5 which is the base for 8i OCP. I'm sure that it is possible to study for 8i OCP on a 9i box (just as it is possible using 8 or even 7.3.4) The creatures are different though.
-- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission UK ========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======: Path: news.sol.net!spool0-nwblwi.newsops.execpc.com!newsfeeds.sol.net!news-out.visi.com!hermes.visi.com!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newsfeed1.earthlink.net!newsfeed.earthlink.net!uunet!lax.uu.net!news.navix.net!u-n-c-a-n-c-e-l-l-e-r From: "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield_at_audit-commission.gov.uk> Newsgroups: alt.config,comp.lang.c,comp.databases.oracle.server Subject: cmsg cancel <a0nqps$njc$1_at_paris.btinternet.com> Control: cancel <a0nqps$njc$1_at_paris.btinternet.com> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 05:39:22 GMT Organization: Navix Internet Subscribers Lines: 2 Message-ID: <cancel.a0nqps$njc$1_at_paris.btinternet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.102.15.34 X-Trace: iac5.navix.net 1009788692 26548 166.102.15.34 (31 Dec 2001 08:51:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse_at_navix.net NNTP-Posting-Date: 31 Dec 2001 08:51:32 GMT X-No-Archive: yes Comment: Anarchy! Fuck You! X-Commentary: I love NewsAgent 1.10, Sandblaster Build 74 (19 March 1999) and the Polaris Cancel Engine V. 6.1 X-Unacanc3l: yes This message was cancelled from within Mozilla...notReceived on Sun Dec 30 2001 - 13:43:57 CST