Re: Anyone using Real Application Clusters on a Solaris system?

Thanks for the input. From the lack of response I am guessing that this is just too new for there to be many active installations. I guess we will be setting up our own test bed (We were going to do that anyway.) and explore this beast on our own.

Thanks to those who replied.

Mark...

On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 08:11:54 -0800, "Pete Sharman" <peter.sharman_at_oracle.com> wrote:

>Hmm, I don't recall seeing the original post on this, but then again our
>news server does some strange things at times.
>
>Yes, I've seen 9i working on SOlaris. I've actually been playing with it
>since the alpha releases, and about the biggest problem I ran into was the
>resizing the SGA dynamically on Solaris 2.6 (hint - DO NOT DO THIS!!!). RAC
>works well on it as well. The only thing I haven't tried is the 9.0.1.2
>patch. If you have specific questions, let me know.
>
>--
>HTH. Additions and corrections welcome.
>
>Pete
>Author of "Oracle8i: Architecture and Administration Exam Cram"
>Currently writing the "Oracle9i New Features for Administrators Exam Cram"
>
>"Controlling developers is like herding cats."
>Kevin Loney, Oracle DBA Handbook
>
>"Oh no, it's not. It's much harder than that!"
>Bruce Pihlamae, long-term Oracle DBA
>
>"Ray Stell" <stellr_at_stell.cns.vt.edu> wrote in message
>news:9vlfp7$iob$1_at_solaris.cc.vt.edu...
>> Mark (mark_at_foxhillgroup.com) wrote:
>> : We are looking at 9i and considering deployment options. Currently we
>> : have a variety of database versions (7.3.x, 8.0.x, 8.1.5, 8.1.6,
>> : 8.1.7) supporting both commercial packages and home grown solutions.
>> : We are planning our migrations but want to determine the deployment
>> : options first. What I am looking for are experiences with 9i, RAC,
>> : DataGuard, any information will be greatly appreciated.
>>
>> : Thanks
>> --
>>
>> Did you get any responses on this at all?
>> ===============================================================
>> Ray Stell stellr_at_vt.edu (540) 231-4109 KE4TJC 28^D
>
>
Received on Tue Dec 18 2001 - 23:55:36 CST